Gustavo Tedesco vs Matheus Cury Bueres Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Tedesco vs M. Cury Bueres

Gustavo Tedesco
BRA
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
22
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Matheus Cury Bueres
BRA
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
22
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tedesco 1 - 0 Bueres
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gustavo Tedesco winning 2 and Matheus Cury Bueres winning 0. The last match between Gustavo Tedesco and Matheus Cury Bueres was at the M25 Vacaria, 29-11-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Gustavo Tedesco getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tedesco | 1 |
| Bueres | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Vacaria(11-29-22)
Gustavo Tedesco
6
6
Matheus Cury Bueres
4
2
G. Tedesco vs M. C. Bueres H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 43.18% (19-25) | Career Total W/L | 47.06% (40-45) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Tedesco vs M. C. Bueres Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gustavo Tedesco has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Matheus Cury Bueres has won 52.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gustavo Tedesco, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matheus Cury Bueres has won 51.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gustavo Tedesco has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matheus Cury Bueres has saved 52.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gustavo Tedesco has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Matheus Cury Bueres winning 50.00% (W/L 2/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gustavo Tedesco has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 13/17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Matheus Cury Bueres has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 13/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 27/34).
- Player level: In the last year, Gustavo Tedesco has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Matheus Cury Bueres has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 2/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gustavo Tedesco winning 1 times and Matheus Cury Bueres being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gustavo Tedesco winning 2 and Matheus Cury Bueres winning 0.
- The last match between Gustavo Tedesco and Matheus Cury Bueres was at the M25 Vacaria, 29-11-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Gustavo Tedesco getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gustavo Tedesco has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Matheus Cury Bueres has played against players with an average rank of 221.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gustavo Tedesco has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matheus Cury Bueres has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gustavo Tedesco has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matheus Cury Bueres has converted 36.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gustavo Tedesco vs Matheus Cury Bueres Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Tedesco vs M. C. Bueres H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve % | 74% (46/62) |
| 63% (24/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 68% (13/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 48% (30/62) | Return Points Win % | 35% (20/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tedesco --%, Bueres 59%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tedesco --%, Bueres 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Tedesco --%, Bueres 35%.
G. Tedesco Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
M. C. Bueres Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 5-7 10-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||

G. Tedesco vs M. C. Bueres Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43.18% (19/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.06% (40/45) |
| 44.32% (39/49) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.45% (85/102) |
| 47.21% (364/407) | Games Win/Loss | 49.37% (858/880) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 43.33% (13/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.26% (27/34) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 49 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 85.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.16 |
| 61% (495/818) | 1st Serve % | 71% (1736/2450) |
| 55% (270/495) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1025/1736) |
| 45% (146/323) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (302/714) |
| 47% (24/51) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (93/230) |
| 36% (275/770) | Return Points Win % | 39% (992/2521) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/9) |
| 43.18% (19/25) | Futures W/L | 52.63% (40/36) |
| 44% (18/41) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (38/82) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 90% (20/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (40/34) |
| 10% (20/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (40/5) |
| 4% (24/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (45/6) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 08:00 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 07:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Landaluce H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Kjaer Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Nishesh Basavareddy
Alexander Blockx
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Tahlia Kokkinis
Reina Goto
Shruti Ahlawat
Ksenia Efremova
Sohyun Park
Mariia TkachevaSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
21:00
H2H 1-0
19:00
H2H 0-0
02:40
H2H 0-0
08:00
H2H 0-0
08:00
H2H 0-0